contact@uniconllc.net(720) 282-5099⚠ Incident Report
Universal Controls SolutionUniversal ControlsSolution
Under Niagara

How UCS connects the platform

The preferred deployment places Neeve Secure Edge or Link inline with, behind or as the controlled path into the OT network. Access uses centralized identity and policy, while the BAS remains on a protected network segment.

Conceptual network riser · Niagara supervisory architecture
PeopleAuthorized users & vendors

Role-based technicians, operators and approved service partners.

PolicyNeeve identity & access

Central policy, authentication and audit context.

ConnectionOutbound secure transport

Controlled encrypted communications without broad inbound exposure.

EdgeNeeve Secure Edge / Link

Protected access point at the OT boundary.

OperationsNiagara + Reflow + BAS

Building supervision, controller networks and equipment remain operationally separate.

The edge placement matters. A device installed merely beside the controls network may not enforce the same security boundary as an inline or controlled-path design.

Field perspective

Strengths and design considerations

No platform is best at everything. We match the system to the building, the people who will support it, and the owner's long-term plan.

Where it is strong

  • Zero-trust access model designed for operational-technology environments.
  • Centralized identity, policy and auditability for staff and outside service providers.
  • Can reduce dependence on broad VPN access into a building network.
  • Creates a controlled foundation for secure remote service and edge applications.

What to plan around

  • Routing, firewall rules, identity ownership and support responsibilities require early IT coordination.
  • The deployment model must prevent easy bypass of the secure access path.
  • Reliable outbound connectivity and ongoing service licensing are part of the operating model.
  • Neeve secures access; it does not replace good Niagara hardening, backups or controller-network design.
Where it fits

A practical fit—not a badge-first recommendation

Neeve is most valuable where owners need remote service without treating every vendor laptop or VPN account as trusted inside the building network.

Best fit

Multi-site remote service

Owners who need governed access across buildings, users and outside partners.

Strong fit

OT network separation

Sites formalizing the boundary between enterprise IT, vendor access and building controls.

Plan carefully

Existing remote-access stacks

VPNs, firewalls and cloud services should be inventoried so the new path removes—not layers on—risk.

Field-earned, not brochure-deep. Our team has installed, programmed and serviced these systems in the field—including lines we do not represent. That first-hand experience lets UCS advocate for the owner, not sell a badge.
Reference points

Current manufacturer resources

These links support the high-level architecture above. Final design depends on controller generation, software versions, licensing, cybersecurity standards and site conditions.

Need safer remote BAS access?

UCS can map the users, systems and trust boundaries before selecting the edge placement and support model.

Talk with an engineer